Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to Foster City
This post compares Fresno, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 56% | 43% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 47% |
| With Kids | 41% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 53% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or Foster City?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than Foster City: 519037 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Fresno versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z