Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Woodland
This post compares Foster City, California to Woodland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | Woodland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 58,324 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $45,325 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $316,500 |
| White | 43% | 69% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 47% | 8% |
| With Kids | 33% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Woodland?
A: Foster City has a smaller population count than Woodland: 33529 compared with 58324 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Woodland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Woodland?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Woodland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 44% for Woodland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z