Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Foster City, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foster City (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,529 | 20,423 |
Income (median) | $105,889 | $31,494 |
Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $322,800 |
White | 43% | 36% |
Black | 2% | 1% |
Asian | 47% | 10% |
With Kids | 33% | 54% |
Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
Rentals | 41% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or South San Jose Hills?
A: Foster City has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 33529 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Foster City versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z