Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to San Fernando
This post compares Foster City, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $370,300 |
| White | 43% | 57% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 47% | 1% |
| With Kids | 33% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 41% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or San Fernando?
A: Foster City has a larger population count than San Fernando: 33529 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z