Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to San Bruno
This post compares Foster City, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $754,700 |
| White | 43% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 47% | 28% |
| With Kids | 33% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or San Bruno?
A: Foster City has a similar population count than San Bruno: 33529 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z