Compare-Cities.com

Compare Foster City to Rancho Cucamonga

This post compares Foster City, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.

Dimension Foster City (city) Rancho Cucamonga (city)
Population 33,529 174,573
Income (median) $105,889 $56,814
Home Value (median) $1,051,000 $444,200
White 43% 62%
Black 2% 9%
Asian 47% 13%
With Kids 33% 39%
Age (median) 40 35
Rentals 41% 38%

Questions and Answers:

Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Foster City has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 33529 compared with 174573 total people.

Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.

Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.

Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.

Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.

The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.

City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z