Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Foster City, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foster City (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,529 | 34,662 |
Income (median) | $105,889 | $77,000 |
Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $633,400 |
White | 43% | 75% |
Black | 2% | 1% |
Asian | 47% | 13% |
With Kids | 33% | 29% |
Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
Rentals | 41% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Pleasant Hill?
A: Foster City has a similar population count than Pleasant Hill: 33529 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z