Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Pittsburg
This post compares Foster City, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $324,500 |
| White | 43% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 16% |
| Asian | 47% | 17% |
| With Kids | 33% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
| Rentals | 41% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Pittsburg?
A: Foster City has a much smaller population count than Pittsburg: 33529 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z