Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Pasadena
This post compares Foster City, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foster City (city) | Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,529 | 141,231 |
Income (median) | $105,889 | $59,401 |
Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $689,700 |
White | 43% | 53% |
Black | 2% | 10% |
Asian | 47% | 16% |
With Kids | 33% | 25% |
Age (median) | 40 | 37 |
Rentals | 41% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Pasadena?
A: Foster City has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 33529 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Foster City versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z