Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Lincoln
This post compares Foster City, California to Lincoln, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | Lincoln (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 46,404 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $59,287 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $389,900 |
| White | 43% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 47% | 6% |
| With Kids | 33% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 21% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Lincoln?
A: Foster City has a smaller population count than Lincoln: 33529 compared with 46404 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Lincoln?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Lincoln?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Foster City versus 21% for Lincoln.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z