Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to La Verne
This post compares Foster City, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $535,900 |
| White | 43% | 74% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 47% | 7% |
| With Kids | 33% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or La Verne?
A: Foster City has a similar population count than La Verne: 33529 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Foster City versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z