Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Foothill Farms
This post compares Foster City, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foster City (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,529 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $105,889 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $201,200 |
White | 43% | 67% |
Black | 2% | 9% |
Asian | 47% | 5% |
With Kids | 33% | 38% |
Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
Rentals | 41% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Foothill Farms?
A: Foster City has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 33529 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z