Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Beverly Hills
This post compares Foster City, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 43% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 47% | 9% |
| With Kids | 33% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Beverly Hills?
A: Foster City has a similar population count than Beverly Hills: 33529 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Foster City versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z