Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foster City to Belmont
This post compares Foster City, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foster City (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,529 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $105,889 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 43% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 47% | 27% |
| With Kids | 33% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foster City or Belmont?
A: Foster City has a similar population count than Belmont: 33529 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foster City or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Foster City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foster City or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Foster City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Foster City versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foster City may include: Sunnyvale, Millbrae, and Belmont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z