Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Wasco
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Wasco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Wasco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,627 | 26,378 |
Income (median) | $39,925 | $31,042 |
Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $155,800 |
White | 67% | 78% |
Black | 9% | 6% |
Asian | 5% | 0% |
With Kids | 38% | 59% |
Age (median) | 33 | 28 |
Rentals | 48% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Wasco?
A: Foothill Farms has a larger population count than Wasco: 33627 compared with 26378 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Wasco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Wasco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 45% for Wasco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z