Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to South Pasadena
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 67% | 54% |
| Black | 9% | 3% |
| Asian | 5% | 29% |
| With Kids | 38% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 48% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or South Pasadena?
A: Foothill Farms has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 33627 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z