Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $374,600 |
| White | 67% | 81% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 5% | 3% |
| With Kids | 38% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 48% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Foothill Farms has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 33627 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z