Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to South El Monte
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | South El Monte (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,627 | 20,712 |
Income (median) | $39,925 | $28,039 |
Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $389,400 |
White | 67% | 59% |
Black | 9% | 0% |
Asian | 5% | 14% |
With Kids | 38% | 40% |
Age (median) | 33 | 34 |
Rentals | 48% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or South El Monte?
A: Foothill Farms has a larger population count than South El Monte: 33627 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z