Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to San Francisco
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 67% | 47% |
| Black | 9% | 5% |
| Asian | 5% | 34% |
| With Kids | 38% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 48% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or San Francisco?
A: Foothill Farms has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 33627 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z