Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Riverbank
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $247,200 |
| White | 67% | 79% |
| Black | 9% | 0% |
| Asian | 5% | 4% |
| With Kids | 38% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 48% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Riverbank?
A: Foothill Farms has a larger population count than Riverbank: 33627 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z