Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 67% | 62% |
| Black | 9% | 9% |
| Asian | 5% | 13% |
| With Kids | 38% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 35 |
| Rentals | 48% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Foothill Farms has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 33627 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z