Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Pico Rivera
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $380,200 |
| White | 67% | 55% |
| Black | 9% | 0% |
| Asian | 5% | 3% |
| With Kids | 38% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 36 |
| Rentals | 48% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Pico Rivera?
A: Foothill Farms has a smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 33627 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z