Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Pasadena
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,627 | 141,231 |
Income (median) | $39,925 | $59,401 |
Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $689,700 |
White | 67% | 53% |
Black | 9% | 10% |
Asian | 5% | 16% |
With Kids | 38% | 25% |
Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
Rentals | 48% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Pasadena?
A: Foothill Farms has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 33627 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z