Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Irvine
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $753,400 |
| White | 67% | 47% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 5% | 41% |
| With Kids | 38% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 34 |
| Rentals | 48% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Irvine?
A: Foothill Farms has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 33627 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z