Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Eureka
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $249,300 |
| White | 67% | 75% |
| Black | 9% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 7% |
| With Kids | 38% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
| Rentals | 48% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Eureka?
A: Foothill Farms has a similar population count than Eureka: 33627 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z