Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Culver City
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $735,600 |
| White | 67% | 62% |
| Black | 9% | 7% |
| Asian | 5% | 15% |
| With Kids | 38% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 48% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Culver City?
A: Foothill Farms has a similar population count than Culver City: 33627 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z