Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Burbank
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $574,300 |
| White | 67% | 70% |
| Black | 9% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 11% |
| With Kids | 38% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 48% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Burbank?
A: Foothill Farms has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 33627 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z