Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Ashland
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $396,400 |
| White | 67% | 44% |
| Black | 9% | 17% |
| Asian | 5% | 20% |
| With Kids | 38% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 48% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Ashland?
A: Foothill Farms has a larger population count than Ashland: 33627 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z