Compare-Cities.com
Compare Foothill Farms to Altadena
This post compares Foothill Farms, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Foothill Farms (CDP) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,627 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $39,925 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $201,200 | $649,800 |
| White | 67% | 53% |
| Black | 9% | 22% |
| Asian | 5% | 6% |
| With Kids | 38% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 43 |
| Rentals | 48% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Foothill Farms or Altadena?
A: Foothill Farms has a smaller population count than Altadena: 33627 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Foothill Farms or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Foothill Farms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Foothill Farms or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Foothill Farms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 48% for Foothill Farms versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Foothill Farms may include: Rosamond, Rancho-Cordova, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z