Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to San Bruno
This post compares Fontana, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $754,700 |
| White | 43% | 49% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 28% |
| With Kids | 53% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or San Bruno?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 207086 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z