Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Riverbank
This post compares Fontana, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $247,200 |
| White | 43% | 79% |
| Black | 8% | 0% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 53% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 35% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Riverbank?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 207086 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fontana does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Fontana versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z