Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Fontana, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $444,200 |
| White | 43% | 62% |
| Black | 8% | 9% |
| Asian | 6% | 13% |
| With Kids | 53% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Fontana has a similar population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 207086 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Fontana versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z