Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Fontana, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $633,400 |
| White | 43% | 75% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 13% |
| With Kids | 53% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Pleasant Hill?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 207086 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Fontana versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z