Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Pittsburg
This post compares Fontana, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $324,500 |
| White | 43% | 33% |
| Black | 8% | 16% |
| Asian | 6% | 17% |
| With Kids | 53% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Pittsburg?
A: Fontana has a larger population count than Pittsburg: 207086 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z