Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Newark
This post compares Fontana, California to Newark, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Newark (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 45,554 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $55,190 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $607,200 |
| White | 43% | 33% |
| Black | 8% | 5% |
| Asian | 6% | 30% |
| With Kids | 53% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 37 |
| Rentals | 35% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Newark?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Newark: 207086 compared with 45554 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Newark?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Newark?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fontana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 30% for Newark.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z