Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Laguna Hills
This post compares Fontana, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $649,700 |
| White | 43% | 69% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 14% |
| With Kids | 53% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 41 |
| Rentals | 35% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Laguna Hills?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Laguna Hills: 207086 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fontana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z