Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to La Verne
This post compares Fontana, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $535,900 |
| White | 43% | 74% |
| Black | 8% | 4% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 53% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 35% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or La Verne?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than La Verne: 207086 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fontana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z