Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Foster City
This post compares Fontana, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 43% | 43% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 47% |
| With Kids | 53% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 35% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Foster City?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Foster City: 207086 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Fontana versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z