Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Eureka
This post compares Fontana, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $249,300 |
| White | 43% | 75% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 53% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 37 |
| Rentals | 35% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Eureka?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Eureka: 207086 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z