Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fontana to Beverly Hills
This post compares Fontana, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fontana (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,086 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $40,918 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $323,300 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 43% | 82% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 9% |
| With Kids | 53% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 35% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fontana or Beverly Hills?
A: Fontana has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 207086 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fontana or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fontana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fontana or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Fontana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Fontana versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fontana may include: Palmdale, Lake-Elsinore, and Mead-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z