Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to South San Francisco
This post compares Folsom, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 69% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 39% |
| With Kids | 38% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or South San Francisco?
A: Folsom has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 75897 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z