Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to South Pasadena
This post compares Folsom, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 69% | 54% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 16% | 29% |
| With Kids | 38% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 40 |
| Rentals | 30% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or South Pasadena?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 75897 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z