Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to San Fernando
This post compares Folsom, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $370,300 |
| White | 69% | 57% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 1% |
| With Kids | 38% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 30% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or San Fernando?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than San Fernando: 75897 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z