Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to San Bruno
This post compares Folsom, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $754,700 |
| White | 69% | 49% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 28% |
| With Kids | 38% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 30% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or San Bruno?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than San Bruno: 75897 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z