Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Folsom, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $444,200 |
| White | 69% | 62% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 16% | 13% |
| With Kids | 38% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
| Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Folsom has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 75897 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z