Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Newark
This post compares Folsom, California to Newark, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Newark (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 45,554 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $55,190 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $607,200 |
| White | 69% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 5% |
| Asian | 16% | 30% |
| With Kids | 38% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 37 |
| Rentals | 30% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Newark?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than Newark: 75897 compared with 45554 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Newark?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Newark?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Newark does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Folsom versus 30% for Newark.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z