Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Laguna Hills
This post compares Folsom, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $649,700 |
| White | 69% | 69% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 14% |
| With Kids | 38% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 41 |
| Rentals | 30% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Laguna Hills?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 75897 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Folsom does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Folsom versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z