Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to La Verne
This post compares Folsom, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $535,900 |
| White | 69% | 74% |
| Black | 4% | 4% |
| Asian | 16% | 7% |
| With Kids | 38% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
| Rentals | 30% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or La Verne?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than La Verne: 75897 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Folsom does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z