Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Foster City
This post compares Folsom, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 69% | 43% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 47% |
| With Kids | 38% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 40 |
| Rentals | 30% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Foster City?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than Foster City: 75897 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z