Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Eureka
This post compares Folsom, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $249,300 |
| White | 69% | 75% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 7% |
| With Kids | 38% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 37 |
| Rentals | 30% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Eureka?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than Eureka: 75897 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z